3 ms·
Tauri 2.0 migration can potentially give you some more performance benefits, because they've greatly enhanced the JS-Rust bridge especially when you're moving l
by M4v3R 1y ago
Tauri 2.0 migration can potentially give you some more performance benefits, because they've greatly enhanced the JS-Rust bridge especially when you're moving lots of data.
- galangalalgol 1y agoWe picked egui instead of tauri because we had more rust skills than web skills. Other than rastered text, whoch I can't find any customers who actually care, are there good reasons to go tauri? It seems widely used, but also widely complained about.
- virtualritz 1y agoWho is 'we'? :) Would you have any webpage or product info, possibly with screenshots? We're building an in-house DCC with egui so I'm curious.
- galangalalgol 1y agoNo, our customers use it internally. Not even sure if they will end up deploying it as a website or a windows application. Which is an advantage of egui i suppose. I just picked it because I don't know any html or javascript and it does all that stuff for you, so it is just a rust app you can browse to. My team didn't know much more JavaScript than I do and they seemed to like it fine, but not as well as something declarative, which it is not.
- Aeolun 1y agoI think the main good reason to go Tauri is getting access to the full JS ecosystem, especially if you already have experience with that. If you don’t not really any reason to complicate your life I think. My app needs wysiwyg editors, and JS is full of them.