3 ms·
>AI art is often terrible and slightly creepy. I have seen AI art that was fine. This is very rare. This is just the "special effects" problem all over again,
by searine 1y ago
>AI art is often terrible and slightly creepy.
I have seen AI art that was fine. This is very rare.
This is just the "special effects" problem all over again, its use is invisible if done correctly. Only the bad produced SFX sticks out and gets called "CGI".
Much like a programmer using AI to supplement their existing knowledge, a lot of artists (way more than you think) are using AI to supplement production of their art. The product is indistinguishable from their non-AI work, it just takes a fraction of the time.
People just aren't talking about it because it is highly stigmatized by the art community.
- steveklabnik 1y agoYes, this is a hunch I have as well.
- nunez 1y agoInterestingly, the proliferation of digital sfx led to lots of jobs going away and the jobs that replaced them being poorly paid relative to workload. It also led to a crap ton of shitty sfx. Also interestingly, diffusion and generative video will probably make this worse by dint of being so much more accessible