3 ms·
> Since I started in the 90s, SW dev has become more and more tightly controlled and feels more like an assembly line. When I started, you could work for weeks
by nyarlathotep_ 1y ago
> Since I started in the 90s, SW dev has become more and more tightly controlled and feels more like an assembly line. When I started, you could work for weeks and months without much interruption. You had plenty of time for experimentation and creativity. Now everything is ticked based and you constantly have to report status and justify what you are doing
Yeah the consistent "reporting" of "status" on "stand-ups" where you say some filler to get someone incapable of understanding what it is that you're doing off your back for 24 more hours has consistently been one of the most useless and unpleasant parts of the job.
- neom 1y agoI tried, but I couldn't get a job as a web dev in the 90s because nobody in my area knew what the web was, I'm not sure anyone in my country did.
- mji 1y ago> you say some filler to get someone incapable of understanding what it is that you're doing off your back for 24 more hours has consistently been one of the most useless and unpleasant parts of the job This sucks for the 50% or so who are like you, but there's another 50% who won't really get much done otherwise, either because they don't know what to do and aren't self-motivated or capable enough to figure it out (common) or because they're actively cheating you and barely working (less common)
- therein 1y agoJust if there were a way to filter people at hiring and perhaps some way to choose to not employ them after doing so...
- aprilthird2021 1y ago> there's another 50% who won't really get much done otherwise, either because they don't know what to do and aren't self-motivated or capable enough to figure it out (common) or because they're actively cheating you and barely working (less common) Idk I barely ever work with people who are like this, and if people become like this, it's usually obvious to everyone that it's happened and they get a talking to in the office then get shown the door
- littlecranky67 1y agoI assume you are in a country with fire-at-will policies. In Germany you have a job security, you can't just fire people without a reason. The difficulty is actually proving their incompetence or unwillingness to work. Thus in my experience (working a self-employed contractor in Germany) this group is far larger than 50%. Also one of my reasons why no good software comes out of germany (and this includes SAP, as long as you show me a single end-user that is happy with working with SAP software).
- goodpoint 1y agoThe ability to deliver a 30 second summary in a daily standup has very little to do with real productivity.
- latency-guy2 1y agoWhy is incapability to make progress at work tasks not a valid reason for job dismissal in Germany? Unless I am misunderstanding something
- littlecranky67 1y agoYou have to prove it is the employees fault by intentionally not completing the task. Incompetence or incapability is not the employees fault, because well, you hired them and judged their ability - probably due to their education (it is a little more complex than that of course). As a concrete example, if you have a CS degree from the 80s and job as a COBOL programer and your employer decides to assign you to a new team doing react+js, the employee is still formally qualified. You couldn't fire him for incompetence, just because a 22 year old bootcamp graduate delivers 10x the results.
- aprilthird2021 1y agoYes I work in the US but my company has extreme time wasting practices designed to have engineers explain every thing they do and why it's worth it. I never found this helpful and find it causes more problems than it solves.
- TexanFeller 1y agoThose people should not have been hired, or should have been let go at 6 months when that became obvious. The real solution to this problem doesn't fit with most management methodology though.
- SonOfKyuss 1y agoIt only makes sense to fire someone who needs to be nudged into getting their job done if you can find a replacement at a similar cost who doesn’t.
- jwHollister 1y ago1+1 is often less than 1. The mediocre unmotivated person is dragging down the other, killing their motivation. You'd be better off without them even if you couldn't replace them.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- georgeecollins 1y ago>> Yeah the consistent "reporting" of "status" on "stand-ups" where you say some filler to get someone incapable of understanding what it is that you're doing off your back In my experience it is human nature to think you are doing something that people around you can't or don't understand. The graveyard is full of irreplaceable people is an old saying. Sometimes the people you report to are morons, but if you consistently report to a moron its time for introspection. There's more that you can do than just suffer that. One place to start is to have some charity for the people you work with.
- nyarlathotep_ 1y ago> graveyard is full of irreplaceable people I am not special and make no claims of it; I am entirely replaceable and I'd make no claims to the contrary. This has nothing to do with me or anyone like me, and everything to do with the "adult daycare" style of project managers. I'm tired of re-iterating to non-technical project managers that status of tickets, why things are "blocked" or why the ask isn't feasible given constraints, over and over again. Time is a flat-circle. If they understood the problem scope better, such questions would not arise. I know this from experience. The majority of them are completely stateless and I'll repeat things daily for weeks on end, explaining the same things over and over again, while they make 0 effort to "unblock" issues. I've had one good project manager in my career that advocated for his technical staff and understood the both the project and business deeply; he was invaluable and a pleasure to work with. I've had many many others that served no tangible purpose whatsoever. My frustration is ostensibly there is a purpose for these jobs beyond employing people with the role of "attending meetings"; I've rarely seen it.
- throw4847285 1y agoYour username is apt, because working with you sounds like encountering the Crawling Chaos Himself, an eldritch being of pure condescension and disdain who unknowingly makes everybody else's lives miserable because they fundamentally do not respect anybody else except themself. Best of luck to you.
- ryandrake 1y ago