4 ms·
> everyone has a certain picture of it in their mind. Which is impossibly irrelevant. > consentual sex, supposedly started without a condom (contrary to agree
by nollidge 14y ago
> everyone has a certain picture of it in their mind.
Which is impossibly irrelevant.
> consentual sex, supposedly started without a condom (contrary to agreement)
If it's contrary to agreement in whole or in part, it's not consensual.
> after the women agreed.
Or she acquiesced. (EDIT: as in, surrendered resistance)
- Dylan16807 14y agoIf it's contrary to agreement in whole or in part, it's not consensual. That's quite a statement to make as if it's universal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_deception http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_deception >The crime—known in Tennessee and California as rape by fraud[1]—is only recognised in few jurisdictions; in all others the definition of rape actually involves lack of consent at the time of intercourse. Even if they agreed to sex based on lies, they still agreed to it. It's an awful behavior but I don't think it should be given the title of 'rape'. No one is being forced upon, whether through physical or psychological means.
- nollidge 14y agoI wasn't speaking about the law, I was speaking about moral behavior. Consent which is anything less than enthusiastic should be frowned upon, at the very least, by all of us.
- Dylan16807 14y agoWell, morally, I feel that lying to someone to sleep with them is sleazy and wrong, but it doesn't traumatize them the way forcing the issue via threat will.