3 ms·
Yes, it would—the dialogic interface is an anchor weighing us down! Yes, yes, it's an accessible demonstration of the technology's mind-blowing flexibility, bu
by gavmor 1y ago
Yes, it would—the dialogic interface is an anchor weighing us down!
Yes, yes, it's an accessible demonstration of the technology's mind-blowing flexibility, but all this "I, you, me, I'm" nonsense clutters the context window and warps the ontology in way that introduces a major epistomological "optical illusion" that exploits (inadvertently?) a pretty fundamental aspect of human cognition—namely our inestimably powerful faculty for "theory of mind."
Install the industrial wordsmithing assembly line behind a brutalist facade—any non-skeumorphic GUI from the past 20 years aughta do.
Check out eg https://n8n.io https://n8n.io for a quick way to plug one-shot inference into an ad-hoc pipeline.
- niemandhier 1y agoI fully agree, where do we get the training data to create a base model? Where do we source the terabyte of coherent text that is devoid of ego?