4 ms·
I think that is the accomplishment. It progressed from not being able to give an answer because it did not have the direct knowledge to being able to make a gue
by cc81 1y ago
I think that is the accomplishment. It progressed from not being able to give an answer because it did not have the direct knowledge to being able to make a guess based on a pattern of naming of others in the family and a clue.
- staticman2 1y agoI asked Gemini and Gemini thinks even knowing Ken's uncle is a junior Ken's father is more likely to be named "John" or "James". If Gemini is correct ChatGPT is dumb and simply got lucky.
- cc81 1y agoCould absolutely be that. Or it is so smart that it realizes that the author believes they have given enough information and that it should not have to land on a low chance guess. So that pattern is the only one that make sense in that case. Maybe unlikely that is that smart though
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- staticman2 1y agoWhat the author provided is not necessarily the same as what the software forwarded to the model, especially if some sort of "recall" feature is being used.
- qntmfred 1y agoour middle names are James.