3 ms·
Make a good model first. Then you can start pushing for usage. Llama 4 isn't even the best open source non-reasoning model.
by seunosewa 1y ago
Make a good model first. Then you can start pushing for usage. Llama 4 isn't even the best open source non-reasoning model.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- phillipcarter 1y agoIt is a good model, but I think my bar is to stop faking benchmarks first.
- littlestymaar 1y agoWhat Llama4 model is good in your opinion?
- phillipcarter 1y agoI've only used Scout, but I found it more than acceptable as a "GPT-4 or better" level model for coding questions. I've not stress tested it in any way because I didn't need to. So it's fine! It's just not special.
- maxloh 1y ago> Llama 4 isn't even the best open source non-reasoning model. It isn't even open source. There is a 700 million monthly active users limit. https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct/blob/main/LICENSE https://huggingface.co/meta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Inst...
- kouteiheika 1y ago> There is a 700 million monthly active users limit. ...so? Who cares? Why does it matter if big megacorporations cannot use it for free? I sure as hell don't care. If you want to complain about the license a better target is the annoying advertising clause: > i. If you distribute or make available the Llama Materials (or any derivative works thereof), or a product or service (including another AI model) that contains any of them, you shall (A) provide a copy of this Agreement with any such Llama Materials; and (B) prominently display “Built with Llama” on a related website, user interface, blogpost, about page, or product documentation. If you use the Llama Materials or any outputs or results of the Llama Materials to create, train, fine tune, or otherwise improve an AI model, which is distributed or made available, you shall also include “Llama” at the beginning of any such AI model name.