3 ms·
I think the study is saying that if you just read the diagnostic criteria, you tend to over-report symptoms and can be detected as likely faking, and that happe
by Imnimo 1y ago
I think the study is saying that if you just read the diagnostic criteria, you tend to over-report symptoms and can be detected as likely faking, and that happens less with the ChatGPT-generated guide (although the effect seems to be of questionable magnitude).
>Our findings demonstrated that the AI-coached simulation group consistently moderated their symptom overreporting and cognitive underperformance compared to the symptom-coached group, as evidenced by group effects in mostly small to medium size (though nonsignificant in underpowered Bonferroni-corrected pairwise comparisons). This effect is also reflected in lower sensitivity rates for detecting individuals in the AI-coached simulation group compared to the symptom-coached group.
Here "symptom-coached group" is the group that was just given a handout of the diagnostic criteria.
- viraptor 1y agoAlternatively, https://romankogan.net/adhd/ https://romankogan.net/adhd/ is a more real-life collection than the direct list of symptoms. I wonder how people would test after that.
- nradov 1y agoIs there any evidence that clinicians can reliably detect faking? Anecdotally I know several people who faked learning disabilities and got official diagnoses in order to get accommodations in school.
- ab5tract 1y agoThere is a much more objective test involving tracking micro movements while performing a series of response tests both before and after medication. Those with ADHD will respond positively in the tracked markers when given medication. Those without ADHD will respond worse.
- DontchaKnowit 1y agoCan yoy elaborate? What markers? Have a very hard time believing this
- ab5tract 1y agoWhat is hard to believe? The effect of stimulants is calmative for genuine ADHD. Anyone else will have more micro fidgets as a result of the medication. This is coupled by response time markers as well as success rate. EDIT: https://www.qbtech.com/adhd-tests/qbtest/ https://www.qbtech.com/adhd-tests/qbtest/
- DontchaKnowit 1y agoI just dont believe this kind of science is credible
- ab5tract 1y agoAnd I bet you consider yourself scientifically minded. Depressing. Do a bit of research on ADHD. Maybe look into mortality rates between medicated and unmedicated ADHD. Consider for a moment why stimulants are prescribed for ADHD in the first place, and not for anything else. If you do the above and still can’t see how a simple test like this is more accurate and scientific than a subjective quiz that can be studied against, then I hate to inform you but you are not as objective a thinker as you might expect you are.
- pcthrowaway 1y agoRelevant article: https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/12/28/adderall-risks-much-more-than-you-wanted-to-know/ https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/12/28/adderall-risks-much-mo... The author basically gives it to anyone who asks for it, and explains why they think gatekeeping does much more harm than good