5 ms·
> China for example, sends huge number of electronics and all kind of other consumer goods that Chinese produce by sweating in 12 hours shifts in 6 day work wee
by alephnerd 1y ago
> China for example, sends huge number of electronics and all kind of other consumer goods that Chinese produce by sweating in 12 hours shifts in 6 day work weeks in exchange for imaginary numbers
That's more a function of subsidizes instead of foreign preference for USD.
Chinese median household incomes (Yuan 34,000 or around $4,700) are much too low to spend on most goods at scale [0], and most of the money that could be spent on expanding the social safety net (and thus incentivizing Chinese consumers to spend instead of save) is spent on industrial subsidizes like tax holidays, a regressive income tax system comparable to the US, and subsidizing various redundant but provincially influential SOEs that can't compete with domestic private sector players (eg. traditional Chinese automotive players like SAIC and Chery versus BYD), and this is reflected in Chinese spending data as well as StatsChina's breakdown of spending by urban and rural Chinese [0].
You are going to be dependent on foreign exports if your domestic consumers can only spend around Yuan 4000/$550 a year on transportation and telecom combined. Even factoring for PPP, it is difficult as these metrics are low in comparison to peer countries from a developmental standpoint.
A lot of the "overproduction" that has made Chinese goods globally dominant is a result of that misalignment between consumers and production.
Expanding the social safety net in China would dramatically enhance Chinese competitiveness over the long term, but top level leadership remains explicitly opposed to what they call "Welfarism" [1]:
"福利主义典范国家，中产塌陷、贫富分化、社会撕裂、民粹喧嚣，这不乏警示— 防止落入“福利主义”养懒汉陷阱"
"In countries that use a welfare model, the middle class is collapsing, the rich and the poor are polarizing, society is torn apart, and populism is rising. This is a warning - Prevent yourself from falling into the trap of "welfarism" to support lazy people"
[0] - https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202501/t20250124_1958443.html https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202501/t202501...
[1] - http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2021/1116/c40531-32283350.html http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2021/1116/c40531-32283350.htm...
- mitthrowaway2 1y agoChina definitely has industrial policy supporting its manufacturing, but the wages argument is begging the question. The USD, as the global reserve currency, is over-valued; if an alternative system were used (eg. the Bancor) and the Yuan allowed to float, then those 34,000 Yuan would buy a lot more and the median US wage would buy less.
- alephnerd 1y agoHypothetically yes, but the lack of social safety net means most of that hypothetical purchasing power expansion in China is moot. China has a medical debt problem [0], education pricing problem [1], and private sector capital crunch [2] similar to that of the US. This makes it much more difficult for the median household to spend in China because there is an incentive to keep saving. In isolation an $8,000 EV looks cheap to us earning a salary in the West, but that is still 1.7x the median household income (so half of all Chinese households have even less money to spend). For half of Chinese households, that's the equivalent of your median American household purchasing a Maserati. And healthcare costs can reach the $8k-15k price point in China for critical operations. The reality is, the median Chinese household is significantly underpaid compared to their peers in Thailand [3] or Malaysia [4] - either incomes have to rise to allow Chinese consumers to consume as well as cover health+education spending, or the central and provincial governments will have to dramatically expand social services in order to cover rising costs. The Chinese consumer cannot replace the American consumer without an expanded social safety net giving some breathing room to spend instead of saving. [0] - https://www.ft.com/content/4d892cd4-e7ef-446d-85c4-93262a7a3ba7 https://www.ft.com/content/4d892cd4-e7ef-446d-85c4-93262a7a3... [1] - https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/china-briefs/high-cost-education-china https://sccei.fsi.stanford.edu/china-briefs/high-cost-educat... [2] - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-18/china-private-equity-venture-funds-seek-more-time-to-deploy-capital https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-18/china-pri... [3] - https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2023/20231018103954_32528.pdf https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/storage/survey_detail/2023/2023... [4] - https://open.dosm.gov.my/dashboard/household-income-expenditure https://open.dosm.gov.my/dashboard/household-income-expendit...
- mitthrowaway2 1y agoWhat I mean is that if the CNY properly appreciates relative to the US dollar, that CNY60k ($8,000) EV becomes a CNY60k ($16,000) EV. The median Chinese wage goes from CNY 34k ($5,000) to CNY 34k ($10,000). Meanwhile imports of agricultural products and other things into China becomes cheaper, and the cost of food gets lower. Most expenses an average Chinese worker pays might be unaffected given how self-reliant China is, but in theory at least the wage gap between Chinese and US workers would close significantly this way, even if the gap in living standards do not.