3 ms·
This is literally what happened in Belgium when politicians did budget. A piece of the expected slice was traffic fines. So that means that any kind of system
by OptionOfT 1y ago
This is literally what happened in Belgium when politicians did budget. A piece of the expected slice was traffic fines.
So that means that any kind of system that would improve traffic other than repressive measures would cost them twice, once to fix the situation and again when they can issue less fines.
- dmos62 1y agoIf I drive carelessly and get a meaningful fine, I'll think twice next time, irrespective of who gets the money. I only care that I am fined. Unless the police starts to administer fines when they shouldn't, all is good, right? What happened in Belgium?
- kergonath 1y agoI don’t know about Belgium specifically, but one of the usual issues is that it incentivises aggressive policing of minor issues that make money (like parking violations), which takes resources out of other problems (like mugging).
- lazide 1y agoIn some situations (cough random towns with sections of highway running through them in Texas), it incentivizes an approach to traffic enforcement which is barely distinguishable from getting mugged.
- FridgeSeal 1y agoPutting the highway, into highway robbery!
- Timwi 1y agoDriving carefully is not a boolean. It's possible to design roads/environments (accidentally or not) in such a way that the “you drove carelessly” metric that triggers the fine statistically applies more often.
- victorbjorklund 1y agoIf they design the road to make it harder to follow the rules it is bad.
- dotancohen 1y agoBad for the driver, good for the government. That's exactly the point.
- victorbjorklund 1y agoNot really. If you hit a person with your car and that person becomes disabled. It will be way more expensive for the govt in the long run compared to a few fines.
- tenzing 1y agoThat's fine for you personally, and it may sound all good from a logical, theoretical, or academic perspective, however I personally know of people who have lost their license due to multiple fines and "demerit points" (NZ) resulting in that consequence. The fines, and loss of license hurt them personally, professionally, and financially, but didn't change their behavior outside of the very short term. In NZ we have people that are in and out of prison due to burglaries, robberies, etc... but the penalties don't change their longer term behavior. There's a deeper problem, and penalties are important, but not the entire fix.
- xythobuz 1y agoThen these people _obviously_ are not fit to drive a multi-ton killing machine at all and should have their license permanently revoked, when they had multiple chances for introspection.
- genewitch 1y agoI think whoever brought up the "fines as revenue" may have thought of Fenton, LA or the like: https://www.propublica.org/article/fenton-louisiana-brought-in-1-million-through-mayors-court https://www.propublica.org/article/fenton-louisiana-brought-...
- mulmen 1y agoAnd yet people drive with suspended licenses every day.
- johnisgood 1y agoYeah, as if "criminals" cared about the laws. :D (See: gun control).
- dmos62 1y agoThe occasional fine I get (and the prospect of getting another) does affect my driving habits and attentiveness, and it's the same for people close to me. Can't talk for others, though I'd expect this to be the norm.