2 ms·
They had to give that up because it was too slow, I think for IO. Unfortunate.
by oblio 1y ago
They had to give that up because it was too slow, I think for IO. Unfortunate.
- Dylan16807 1y agoIt's complicated. WSL1 is much faster at accessing the drives mounted in Windows, but much slower at accessing its own emulated drive. If you have control over where you put your git repo, WSL2 will hit max speed. If you want it shared between OSes, WSL2 will be slower.
- akho 1y agoIt also didn't have working fsync, and corrupted SQLite databases. I think that's more important.