3 ms·

It is the same license but the copyright notice is different, so no, not sufficient.

• gmm1990 1y ago
  Fair enough response to my post but they have the llama license too https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/llama/llama.cpp/LICENSE https://github.com/ollama/ollama/blob/main/llama/llama.cpp/L...
  • camgunz 1y ago
    The GH issue's point [0] is that this isn't in the binary distributions, but it has to be "included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software" (from the MIT license), which applies to binary distributions as well. [0]: https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/3185 https://github.com/ollama/ollama/issues/3185
  • grodriguez100 1y ago
    Right, sorry. Didn’t notice.