3 ms·
We didn't have better testing procedures and we got here. With better testing procedures, would we have gotten here sooner, in the same amount of time, or slow
by unsupp0rted 1y ago
We didn't have better testing procedures and we got here.
With better testing procedures, would we have gotten here sooner, in the same amount of time, or slower?
My contention is slower. And this seems obvious, because in any Cold War sabotage handbook for slowing down a project, the first rule is to insist on more documentation, more consensus, more verification and validation: i.e. more "testing" and less "push to prod".
- maxerickson 1y agoOf course we tested our way here. Billions of dollars spent on research and development. You are also sort of begging the question. Better testing wouldn't be better if it was worse.