4 ms·
So they moved from hg to git? Or is this just an official mirror
by CorrectHorseBat 1y ago
So they moved from hg to git? Or is this just an official mirror
- shit_game 1y agofirefox development has been moved from mercurial to git since early november of 2023 https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Going-Git https://www.phoronix.com/news/Firefox-Going-Git
- swiftcoder 1y agoInteresting that their issues are blamed on "dual SCM", not on Mercurial itself. I guess just the weight of contributors expecting Git as the default is sinking the big Mercurial projects these days.
- dgoldstein0 1y agoIsn't mercurial abandonware? Or maybe I'm just remembering that gitlab dropped support. If it's not dead yet seems to be getting there
- arp242 1y agoThey had a release just a few days ago. It's definitely not abandonware.
- swiftcoder 1y agoIt’s still used by Meta, at any rate (albeit a very scaled version thereof). Meta picked it for their monorepo when Linus wasn’t willing to play ball on extending Git for their use case.
- arp242 1y agoIs it still used there? I know they did in the past, but reading up a bit on the background on all of this I found https://github.com/facebook/sapling https://github.com/facebook/sapling, and it seems that's what they're using now?
- swiftcoder 1y agoI don't know for sure today, but Sapling was mercurial-compatible, at least early in development.
- Kuinox 1y agoI tried to contribute a few years ago. The mercurial clone was taking multiple hours. They already had an non official git, which took 15 minutes to clone.
- IshKebab 1y agoThey supported Git and Hg until now. This means they are dropping Hg support.
- sfink 1y agoNot yet at least. Currently both are still supported, it's just that the core repo is now in git syncing to hg rather than the other way around. But I think hg support is going away. We hg enthusiasts at Mozilla are mostly fleeing to Jujutsu.