4 ms·
This does not seem like a very impressive result. It's using such a small set of bricks and the results don't really look much like the intended thing. It feel
by stevage 1y ago
This does not seem like a very impressive result. It's using such a small set of bricks and the results don't really look much like the intended thing.
It feels like a hand-crafted algorithm would get a much better result.
- otabdeveloper4 1y agoWhat we need is an AI where you feed it some photos of your pile of bricks and it generates you instructions based on the bricks you have. (Totally feasible with today's technology, but you'll need to train your own specialized models.)
- stevage 1y agohttps://au.lifehacker.com/toys-board-games/50948/news/scan-your-lego-with-this-app-to-figure-out-what-to-build https://au.lifehacker.com/toys-board-games/50948/news/scan-y...
- amelius 1y agoWhat I'd be interested in most is a robot that can assemble a model from a pile of bricks/parts.
- dspillett 1y agoThere already exists an app that will, from photos of your pile, pick out models you can make from a large library of existing models. Though IIRC that has been around long enough that it isn't quite using what people are currently calling AI (instead using older ML techniques for brick identification, and a basic DB search to pick out the valid plans for the resulting list of bricks).
- Spellman 1y agoAlready exists, put out by LEGO https://brickit.app/ https://brickit.app/
- Loughla 1y agoMy experience with that is that it gives you unbelievably simplistic builds, not the complicated things you might be imagining.
- KurSix 1y agoBut I think the cool part here isn't photorealism, it's the combo of language understanding and physical buildability
- nkko 1y agothis is very cool considering it is a fine-tuned 1B model
- tokai 1y agoThe (fake) texturing is the only thing making it somewhat work. As normal colored bricks it would just be lumps of lego.