3 ms·
Well, sure, but that’s irrelevant here. Most of the commentary is presuming to know something about OpenAI’s motivations. That’s not honesty; it’s just an opin
by mrcwinn 1y ago
Well, sure, but that’s irrelevant here.
Most of the commentary is presuming to know something about OpenAI’s motivations. That’s not honesty; it’s just an opinion. So my question stands. Does anyone have a positive opinion?
Here’s a take. For those of us who use their tools in our day to day, we might take for granted that we have the existing and new infrastructure to support that product. Is it more good than bad that other parts of the world could reach beyond their current grasp? I hope so. It might be.
- ClumsyPilot 1y ago> presuming to know something about OpenAI’s motivations To increase shareholder value?
- staticman2 1y agoI guess you were hoping that people wouldn't post opinions related to "democracy" in a discussion of a product offering "democratic AI rails." You worked very hard to offer an "opinion" that largely ignored the topic of discussion. The problem is your "opinion" in avoiding the topic of discussion says basically nothing.