What goes both ways? Everyone involved is fine with proprietary libraries being used. > The LGPL is under many distributed closed solutions that are sold for

What goes both ways? Everyone involved is fine with proprietary libraries being used. > The LGPL is under many distributed closed solutions that are sold for profit, so I think its WEEE bit of the kettle calling .. ya you get it. No, I don't get it. The LGPL allows that and they're happy with it. Where are you seeing hypocrisy?