3 ms·
So just because lock picking lawyer can pick the locks at your home you should just get rid of the locks? (and maybe even the doors too) Making it hard enough
by doikor 1y ago
So just because lock picking lawyer can pick the locks at your home you should just get rid of the locks? (and maybe even the doors too)
Making it hard enough is good enough. The difference in 1% of games having a cheater and 5 or 10% is massive in the player experience.
- JadeNB 1y ago> So just because lock picking lawyer can pick the locks at your home you should just get rid of the locks? (and maybe even the doors too) If the locks treated me, the legitimate owner, as a criminal and required the kind of low-level access that software that runs at the kernel level gets, and still didn't work, then maybe.
- dingnuts 1y agoit's more like, I'm not going to spend money on a smart lock that reports my movements to a third party just so a burglar can chuck a landscaping stone through my window and unlock the door
- wiseowise 1y ago> So just because lock picking lawyer can pick the locks at your home you should just get rid of the locks? (and maybe even the doors too) The solution is not to make the lock so hard that it inconveniences you, the user, it is to shoot intruder on sight (aka better moderation).
- trinsic2 1y agoThis is more like giving control over the locks to a corporation so they can make sure you are safe. Its not even remotely the same thing as you just described.