3 ms·

It would be a lot more usable if you could put that info in the commit.

• OptionOfT 2y ago
  That on its own is a security risk, as it would introduce means to hide a commit in the commit itself. At least with the . file you have to make 2 separate transactions.
  • IshKebab 2y ago
    No it wouldn't. You would still be able to see the commit in logs and file histories and if you ran blame without the skipping option.
• prepend 2y ago
  No. I don’t want the author to make that decision for me. I’d rather git record everything and then I can choose how to view or render it. Different people have different view preferences.
  • jayd16 2y ago
    Ok but why not both checked in and user settings with the user overriding the repo?
• mbork_pl 2y ago
  I would guess quit a few malware authors would also love such a feature.