3 ms·
The strategic business dynamic here is very interesting. We used to have "GPT-wrapper SaaS". I guess what we're about to see now is the opposite: "SaaS/MCP-wrap
by bjornsing 1y ago
The strategic business dynamic here is very interesting. We used to have "GPT-wrapper SaaS". I guess what we're about to see now is the opposite: "SaaS/MCP-wrapper GPTs".
- jimbokun 1y agoThe GPT wrappers were always going to be subsumed by improvements to the models themselves. LLMs wrapping the services makes more sense, as the data stored in those services adds a lot of value to off the shelf LLMs.
- bjornsing 1y agoI think I agree. There’s a lot of utility in a single LLM that can talk to many SaaS and integrate them. Feels like a better path forward than a separate LLM inside every SaaS.