> it comes at the cost of destabilising something foundational like Chromium the benefits have already been contributed to chrome, and is easily available even

> it comes at the cost of destabilising something foundational like Chromium the benefits have already been contributed to chrome, and is easily available even if funding is cut today. However, google didn't give chrome and their money away altruistically. They wanted something back - control of the browser market, and ability to dictate certain aspects of the web. I do not believe they should have this ability. Taking away monopolistic practises with the browser market can help with this aspect.