3 ms·

I hope you don't wonder why civil asset forfeiture persists. It's like you're laying one brick on the road to hell. Multiply by everyone else and their pet is

I hope you don't wonder why civil asset forfeiture persists. It's like you're laying one brick on the road to hell. Multiply by everyone else and their pet issues and the whole damn thing gets paved. What even is the point of principals if you don't stand by them?

bluecalm 2y ago
What other "pet issue" kills 40k people a year and injures 50-100x of that? It's a huge issue which warrants radical steps.
gosub100 2y ago
> Multiply by everyone else and their pet issues and the whole damn thing gets paved. Slippery slope fallacy. Why don't you refute the central point of what I suggested?
- vel0city 2y ago
  You don't have to have civil asset forfeiture to impound the car.
  - gosub100 2y ago
    then call it something euphemistic with many more words, but "suing the car" is ultimately what it would entail.