3 ms·

> On the legal immigration side cancel all non-tourist visa types and let existing visas expire. You're saying you want to remove immigration visa's from the S

> On the legal immigration side cancel all non-tourist visa types and let existing visas expire. You're saying you want to remove immigration visa's from the Spouse of a US Citizen? A US Citizen's intercountry adopted orphaned child, and immediate relatives (like a parent) of said US citizens? I mean trumps parent-in-laws already took advantage of that on their way to being naturalized, so Im sure he'd be good getting rid of that one now. > Replace them with a simple employer sponsored visa with a ~400k/year (inflation adjusted) payroll tax and let any company that wants to pay the tax sponsor as many people as they want. You also want US farms to pay 400K/year for their seasonal farm workers (H-2A), when they are already squeezed by the couple thousands they pay plus all the other cost currently? Do you want to be able to afford food? I guess we can put up windmills on current farm land and import all food from countries that exploit their workers and pay them far less than $15-20/h these workers get. They probably don't provide meals, safe housing & work conditions either, as is already required with H-2A. Now you want them to pay 400k on top of that because it's difficult to find US Citizens who do not see this kind of farm work as "below" them?

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
AustinDev 2y ago
Sure, Spousal visas make sense. No prob. I also said that there needs to be a seasonal farm work visa. It was an off the cuff framework but yes, those things make sense. Your derision is not really that becoming.
- seanmcdirmid 2y ago
  There are seasonal farm work visas, they are just too limited in number and too expensive.
- 1659447091 2y ago
  > I also said that there needs to be a seasonal farm work visa. That's the issue with current leadership and your chain of thinking on an issue with only a passing broad assumption of the domain. A large enough portion of the population has been convinced that drastic change needs to happen. Now when a wreaking ball attacks a component of a larger machine, people say good it wasn't needed, look the machine is still working, I mean it's sputtering and smoking but working, give it time - then ignore it and move on to wreaking something else. The problem is wanting this drastic change without even understanding what is being wreaked in the first place or trying to understand why it's there. I specifically said H-2A. There doesn't need to be seasonal farm work visa's added to your idea. We already have them.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

AustinDev 2y ago

Sure, Spousal visas make sense. No prob. I also said that there needs to be a seasonal farm work visa. It was an off the cuff framework but yes, those things make sense. Your derision is not really that becoming.

seanmcdirmid 2y ago
There are seasonal farm work visas, they are just too limited in number and too expensive.
1659447091 2y ago
> I also said that there needs to be a seasonal farm work visa. That's the issue with current leadership and your chain of thinking on an issue with only a passing broad assumption of the domain. A large enough portion of the population has been convinced that drastic change needs to happen. Now when a wreaking ball attacks a component of a larger machine, people say good it wasn't needed, look the machine is still working, I mean it's sputtering and smoking but working, give it time - then ignore it and move on to wreaking something else. The problem is wanting this drastic change without even understanding what is being wreaked in the first place or trying to understand why it's there. I specifically said H-2A. There doesn't need to be seasonal farm work visa's added to your idea. We already have them.