4 ms·
I want to make a point that might be misinterpreted, so I want to make clear I am not at all defending Microsoft. That said, Microsoft isn't a person and has n
by aydyn 1y ago
I want to make a point that might be misinterpreted, so I want to make clear I am not at all defending Microsoft.
That said, Microsoft isn't a person and has no agency by itself. It is specific persons/developers/managers violating the licenses and stringing along open source developers in bad faith.
Who are these people? Why is the blame not falling on them, specifically?
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- vb-8448 1y agoehm, it doesn't work this way, fortunately ... Microsoft, the corporation, is definitively responsible if there's a copy right violation. Who exactly did what it's a Microsoft internal thing, unless Microsoft demonstrates that this has been done in bad faith and Microsoft did everything what is "reasonable" to avoid this happening ...
- aydyn 1y agoIt absolutely does work this way.