> Why did you edit it so drastically? Was it because of poor reading comprehension? Yes I fucked up reading at first. It's correct now. Appending without edi

> Why did you edit it so drastically? Was it because of poor reading comprehension? Yes I fucked up reading at first. It's correct now. Appending without editing: I've had a long day, I don't usually edit nearly as much. Appending without editing: I should have just deleted it and made a new comment, I guess? I didn't know you were trying to reply, sorry. Appending without editing: > A person asserted something (through conversational norms), and I basically said "Isn't there a reason for that?", and now I'm the one who is being argued with as if I asserted the thing in the first place. Why aren't you responding to streetmeat, telling them that it doesn't spam "wait...wait"? The problem was not the first sentence where you did that. The problem was the second sentence. Don't motte and bailey this. Appending without editing: Also for the record I stand by the intent of the lines you quoted, though the wording is flawed in the first quote and fixed in my final version. The entirely incorrect thing I said at first is gone and you didn't respond to it so at least that worked out.