4 ms·
What is more likely: - a physics-breaking thermodynamic anomaly - a food addicted person is lying about their consumption 200 kcal a day.. yeah sure. A human
by nom 1y ago
What is more likely:
- a physics-breaking thermodynamic anomaly
- a food addicted person is lying about their consumption
200 kcal a day.. yeah sure. A human body needs more than that just to breathe and pump blood. Even comatose a skinny person needs 5 times as much.
Overweight people have a significantly higher metabolic base rate. Just breathing can easily be 1000kcal a day if your lungs have to move 30 kilos of upper body fat 10 times a minute. They also have more muscle mass compared to the average person their size, even when not physically active, which increases MBR as well.
Weight loss and gain is a solved problem, but self control and human behavior is not.
Perpetuating myths of impossible weight loss is not beneficial for our society and moves us further away from solving the underlying issues.
- guerrilla 1y agoIt's insane how arrogant people can be about this. You have not accounted for all of the variables and that is blatantly obvious. The phenomenon is well known and there are multi-variable equations for it, many different models. One popular model is that NEET can decrease below the caloric deficit, meaning you still gain weight by becoming subconsciously lazier despite everything feeling equally difficult subjectively. There are several other more advanced models adding other variables, some depending on insulin sensitivity, for example. Anyway, no physics is broken, laymen are just naive to the complexity abd adaptability of biology.
- _Algernon_ 1y ago200kcal/day is less than 10W. Since all energy the body uses is released as heat this puts the maximum sustainable heat radiation with such a diet at 10W. That's about the level of a typical household LED, which at most feels slightly warm to the touch. At that energy level you could not sustain weight while maintaining body temperature let alone having a healthy metabolism. That's just a plain fact. You will lose weight long before you reach 200kcal/day.
- guerrilla 1y agoThat's a good argument against what I said for this particular case. I didn't realize 200kcal was so little. Imagine my comment was written in reply to a higher number though because that criticism is definitely valid for a large number of posts people make in general. ;)
- krageon 1y agoBut it is basic physics, which is in fact being violated. It's really very normal to require exceptional proof for this. Like literally any scientific study, not just an anecdote claiming magic.
- stonemetal12 1y agoBasic physics says CI/CO applies to a closed system. Show me a closed system human and then it will be applicable. E=MC^2 is basic physics too. So eat a pea and have enough calories for the rest of your life and then some?
- krageon 1y agoYou are implying that humans receive energy from another source, which is an extraordinary claim that you should motivate somehow.
- karn97 1y agoNutritional science is pseudo science at best. I had rather continue to believe in thermodynamics lmao
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- bluecheese452 1y agoIt is the amazing the hoops people will jump through and the lies they will tell themselves and others rather than facing the obvious truth that they are consuming too many calories.
- raincom 1y agoIf you treat humans as biological machines, signaling system (hormones, endocrine system) is very important. When signaling system is messed up, your CI/CO model with self-control doesn't work at all. Signals need to be fixed.
- tekla 1y agoSo? That doesn't disprove the premise of CI/CO. CI/CO is the notion that humans exist in the physical world and thus obey the laws of thermodynamics.
- raincom 1y agoCI + self-control or will --> CO (that's the hypothesis sold by many) CI + hormones --> CO (that's an alternative hypothesis)
- yakz 1y ago> Weight loss and gain is a solved problem, but self control and human behavior is not. Semaglutide and tirzepatide address the self control and human behavior problems. They stop you from wanting to eat more.
- iteria 1y agoI can believe this as a human who fasts. I just don't eat every other day. I've fasted for multiple days. You would amazed at how much the scale doesn't move. I can lose zero weight after 36 hours of nothing but water entering me. The body is less CICO and more a system trying to maintain homeostasis as much as possible and pulling ever lever it can. Yes, eventually eating every other day I did lose weight, but we're talking a steady glide of 1-2lbs a week nothing as severe as people would expect a severely overweight person who only ate half the week to lose.
- djmips 1y agohttps://www.diabetes.co.uk/blog/2018/02/story-angus-barbieri-went-382-days-without-eating/ https://www.diabetes.co.uk/blog/2018/02/story-angus-barbieri...