4 ms·
I think it depends a lot on how you value your time. I'm personally willing to spend hundreds or thousands per month happily if it saves me enough hours. I'd es
by danenania 2y ago
I think it depends a lot on how you value your time. I'm personally willing to spend hundreds or thousands per month happily if it saves me enough hours. I'd estimate that if I were to do consulting, I'd likely be charging in the $150-250 per hour range, so by my math, it's pretty easy to justify any tools that save me even a few hours per month.
- _joel 2y agoYou get the same results for cheaper by using a different tool (Windsurf's better imho).
- danenania 2y agoThat may be, but I think tools with a fixed monthly fee are always going to have an incentive to reduce their own costs on the backend and route you toward less capable models, cut down context size, produce less output, stop before the task is truly finished, etc. Given how much time these models can save me, I'd rather optimize for capability and just accept whatever the price is as a cost of doing business. (Within reason I guess—I probably wouldn't go beyond $2-3k per month at this point, unless there was very clear ROI on that spend.) Also, it's not only about saving time. More powerful AI tools allow me to build things it would otherwise be impossible to build... that's just as important as the time/cost equation.
- _joel 2y agoIt's literally the same model. I can build more complex stuff in windsurf as the IDE is better than Cline/Roocode integration in vscode. It's still the same model under the hood. Sonnet 202500219 I mean, you pour money down the drain if you think it's helping, have at it :P
- famouswaffles 2y agoIt's the same model but not necessarily the same context. Like he said, those tools try to be very 'smart' with context to save costs. You're not actually getting all the files you add in the context window, you're getting a RAG'd version of it, which is generally much worse if the un-RAG'd code is still within the effective context limit.
- ChadMoran 2y agoI've spent more than 40 hours/week and close to $1,000 in API credits using these tools. For me the ranking goes. But, we all will have difference experiences. 1. Claude Code 2. Cursor 3. Cline. 4. Windsurf
- greymalik 2y ago$1000 over how many 40 hour weeks?
- ChadMoran 2y agoHonesty not sure quite a few. 6-8 or so?
- _joel 2y agoHow you can place windsuf in number 4 is interesting, especially given it's very similar to cursor but is leaner on the UI and Cline is a vs-code plugin that very verbose. I'll stick with Windsurf, especially given their upcoming announcement.
- ChadMoran 2y agoI care a lot less about UI and more about quality of output. Windsurf has had some of the lowest quality outputs for me.
- retinaros 2y agook but in what way a terminal is a bettter UI than an IDE? I am trying all of them on a weekly basis and windsurf UX seems miles ahead/ more efficient than a terminal. that is also what OAI believes or else they wouldnt try to buy it
- ChadMoran 2y agoNot a better UI at all but seems like they're able to then focus on what matters in these early stages and that's quality of output.
- danenania 2y agoOne thing that is clearly better in the terminal is secrets management/environment variables. It's also much easier to control execution in a structured and reliable way in the terminal. Here's an automated debugging use case, for example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-_76U_nK0Y https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-_76U_nK0Y
- renewiltord 2y agoAfter I have a session going on, the Claude Code terminal app has been given the permission to do everything I want it to. Then I just let it burn itself out doing whatever. It's a background task. That's the big advantage. I don't baby sit it.
- cube2222 2y agoI like the terminal UX because VS Code (and any forks of it) is not my editor of choice, and swapping around to use an editor just for AI coding is annoying (I was doing that with the Zed Assistant a lot). With Claude Code I can stay in Goland, and have Claude Code in the terminal.
- esafak 2y agoYou could also try JetBrains' Junie and Sourcegraph Cody.
- 2y ago
- taneq 2y agoHow do you price this in? If you’re charging by the hour, paying out of pocket to reduce your hours seems self-defeating unless you raise your rates enough to cover both the costs and the lost hours. I can’t imagine too many clients would accept “I’m very expensive per hour because I’m fast, because I get AI to do most of it.”
- esafak 2y agoAs the OP said, he can now tackle more complex tasks: > More powerful AI tools allow me to build things it would otherwise be impossible to build... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43709775 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43709775
- SoftTalker 2y agoAre you still working 40 hours a week? If so, what's the difference?
- kadushka 2y agoI don’t - if I can use a tool that saves me 10 hours a week, that’s 10 hours more beach time for me.
- greymalik 2y agoAccomplishing more in that 40 hours?
- SoftTalker 2y agoAnd being paid more? Most salaried employees would not be.
- mwigdahl 2y agoOr, increasingly, how the company values your time. If Claude Code can make a $100K/year dev 10% more productive, it's worth it to the employer to pay anything under $1600/month for it (assuming fully loaded cost of the employee to the business is twice salary).
- charcircuit 2y agoProductivity and business value are not linearly related. It could provide 0 business value to make someone 10% more productive.
- mwigdahl 2y agoI was thinking of productivity as generation of business value rather than something less correlated like lines of code produced. But sure, it's probably more accurate to directly say "business value".
- otabdeveloper4 2y ago> if it saves me enough hours You're being paid to type? I want your job.