4 ms·
> I'm surprised the websites don't even acknowledge this yet. Well, why would you waste the opportunity to enrage Americans against their government, for free?
by throw310822 2y ago
> I'm surprised the websites don't even acknowledge this yet.
Well, why would you waste the opportunity to enrage Americans against their government, for free? "Your $5 package has arrived on time, now you only have to pay the $75 extra that the candidate you voted for has decided to take from you". It's the best ads campaign ever, and it's entirely free.
- Aurornis 2y agoIt's not that complicated. They don't pay the tariffs. The person receiving the package does. Many carriers will slap you with the tariff charge, a brokerage fee, and then send you to collections if you don't pay it. The vendors don't care because they're making the sale and the tariffs are the other person's responsibility. Caveat emptor.
- robryan 2y agoKind of. People can always refuse to pay it and charge back. I'd imagine the US is about to have a massive amount of unclaimed parcels to deal with.
- rapind 2y agoI doubt credit card purchases will be an option once we start seeing a lot of chargebacks. They are an absolute pita to deal with for the vendor and processor. I expect your payment options will be limited to those that don’t allow chargebacks.
- _heimdall 2y agoI assume we'll see backups on both sides. Containers backed up in Chinese ports and a huge backlog of unclaimed packages and delayed tariff bills waiting for USPS/UPS/FedEx to process them.
- petersellers 2y agoThe person you are replying to isn't claiming that the seller pays the tariffs, they are saying that it's not in the seller's interest to notify buyers of the tariff charge because it's essentially free anti-tariff messaging once buyers are hit with the sudden fees.
- willvarfar 2y agobut in the process all their customers will have been burned buying something from Temu and many will be wary of buying in the future even if the tariff situation improves etc?
- Symbiote 2y agoThat's certainly how it worked out in Europe, where the processing fee was much less (€5-10 usually). Since 2021 foreign merchants can send the goods tax paid, they collect the VAT and send it to to EU country, so there's no fees at customs. It works perfectly fine, but many people don't realize it or don't trust this.
- robryan 2y agoThis is the Australian system as well. A lot cheaper for the government to collect with the tradeoff that small no name Chinese sellers can pretty much ignore it without penalty.
- stavros 2y agoYep, this is my experience here in Greece. I'd randomly get maybe 5% of packages having a 3 € "customs fee" on top, but everything else was much cheaper. Now I have to pay VAT and import duties on everything, nothing gets extra fees but everything costs 50% more. I guess the intent was to let local shops compete with AE, and they succeeded, because the prices are much more in line with the local market, I just miss all the cheap stuff :P
- Aurornis 2y agoYou're overthinking it. They're not deliberately plotting some anti-tariff surprise campaign. They're just doing business as usual.
- roshin 2y ago> send you to collections if you don't pay it That doesn't make sense. So can I cause troubles to someone by ordering an unwanted $1 temu item to their house, and thereby summon a collection agency to them (if they don't pay the $75 fee)?
- prmoustache 2y agothey'll just refuse the item and thus the import fee.
- diffeomorphism 2y agoYou ordered the package, so you have to pay the fees. If you gift the package to someone, that is nice of you but they do not become involved in your purchase by that.
- stavros 2y agoThe GP meant if I maliciously order a $1 in your name, specifically to cause you to pay.
- vincnetas 2y agowow i see a variation of SWAT'ing someone. Just flood your unliked neighbour with aliexpress packages. It costs you 0.5$ ant 75$ for him. real life DoS attack.
- macNchz 2y agoOrdering pizzas cash-on-delivery to someone’s house is already a fairly common form of online harassment (sometimes also a precursor to swatting).
- mrguyorama 2y agoAnd because they aren't morons, Pizza places will generally deny an order of 20 pizzas, pay on delivery, to an address they don't have an existing relationship with. Cops haven't seemed to figure out that way of reducing abuse. Maybe if we pay them what we pay pizza delivery workers they will figure out how not to swat people.
- numpad0 2y agoThe parent comment is joking that everyone should look for disgruntled Temu users and ask if they have few minutes to talk about laws and tariffs. No offense to guys talking about other topics on those occasions.
- crazygringo 2y agoBut the person receiving the package doesn't receive the package until they've paid the tariff. You don't have to pay it -- if you don't, the package gets returned to sender or destroyed. The post office delivers you a slip with information to go to your local post office to pay it and pick up the package. With UPS and FedEx you get a notice to pay online, and they deliver it once you do, as far as I know. I've never heard of something being delivered without the tariff already having been paid, and then it going to collections. Has anyone ever experienced that personally? I don't see how that would be legal, or why a delivery service would expose themselves to risk of nonpayment.
- Der_Einzige 2y agoThis is literally false. My wife paid for a jacket from Ireland. Ireland jacket arrives. Weeks later, tariff shit comes in the mail.
- crazygringo 2y agoThat is not normal. Even a recent article explains: > US customers who placed orders on shopping websites like the popular Chinese fast-fashion platform Shein have been particularly impacted, even if they made their purchases long before the tariffs were announced. They are now forced to either pay hefty fees—in some cases, more than the value of the items inside — or have their packages sent back. > They show Love’s order was put on hold for several hours, during which she received the notice asking her to pay the import duties. DHL also noted the package would be returned in five days if she declined to do so. https://www.wired.com/story/tariffs-china-prices-fees-shein-temu/ https://www.wired.com/story/tariffs-china-prices-fees-shein-... I can find a few anecdotes online about FedEx delivering first and then charging later. I can also find people saying they called FedEx and refused to pay, and FedEx waived the amount. I'm not a lawyer, but I don't see how FedEx can hold you responsible for payment when you didn't engage in business with them -- you didn't purchase anything from them and you didn't sign any contract with them. If they paid the tariff before delivering to you, then that's on them.
- 2y ago
- rdtsc 2y ago> They don't pay the tariffs. The person receiving the package does. How does that work? I am assuming it’s not US as I had never got any tariff charges or brokerage fees from the likes of FedEx or UPS.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- scott_w 2y agoYou get a letter from your delivery company (in the UK, usually the Post Office or Royal Mail) with a link to pay import taxes. Once you pay, the delivery is scheduled. Depending on country rules, it is sometimes possible for the sender to pay and then include the charges in their delivery fees.
- rdtsc 2y agoAh interesting. Sounds like a UK or EU thing. Thanks for explaining
- wqaatwt 2y agoIn the EU they do care (or rather the advertised price already included all fees, tariffs and VAT). I think they also send everything from EU warehouses because that loophole was closed years ago.
- throwawaymaths 2y agoThat's not what happens. You see the price tag, you just don't buy it, is what happens.
- margalabargala 2y agoThat's not how tariffs work. You pay the sticker price, which does not include tariffs. The package ships. It arrives at the US border, and the carrier (DHL or whoever) bills you for the import tax before it leaves the port. Maybe this will change, but up until now when importing things, tariffs were not part of the price paid to the seller.
- _xtrimsky 2y agoI see some ways this could be exploited. Let's say I have a nemesis, I could in theory spend 100$ in packages from China, and ship it to them. And they'll have to pay 245$ in tariffs ? (245% today).
- margalabargala 2y agoIt's not exploitable in that way. The bill received is a "you must pay this if you want the package. If you do not, we will destroy the package". It's not a contractual obligation where you get sent to collections or take a credit hit if you don't pay. In the situation you described, the end result is that your nemesis does nothing, pays nothing, and you are out $100.