3 ms·

I don't disagree but you choosing contrarianism to show you're clever and know a lot here (which worked!) made it sound like CERN was expecting a SUSY particle

I don't disagree but you choosing contrarianism to show you're clever and know a lot here (which worked!) made it sound like CERN was expecting a SUSY particle or whatever (which it wasn't)

T-A 2y ago
> you choosing contrarianism ? > to show you're clever and know a lot ?!? I contribute to discussions when I have the time and think I have something relevant to say. HN is hardly the right place to show off about physics, and trying to do so anonymously would be particularly pointless. > made it sound like CERN was expecting a SUSY particle That's not what I wrote. My point was explicitly about expectations on the theory side. Perplexed.