3 ms·
Robust performance, error handling that's not stuck in 1982, and cross platform would be my guesses, but agree the OP could be more spicific as there are more b
by throwaway519 2y ago
Robust performance, error handling that's not stuck in 1982, and cross platform would be my guesses, but agree the OP could be more spicific as there are more benefits.
- throw1223323 1y agoI hate Go as much as anyone, but it has incredible cross platform support. There's built in cross compilation for building a static binary across window/mac/linux. It's the number 1 feature in Go, lol.
- hsbauauvhabzb 1y agoSo does C#, python, node and a variety of other languages.
- throwaway519 1y agoThis comment implies you've not used Go. It really isn't equivalent to the NPM and dependency hell that's node. Or picking the number of workers in Gunicorn. Or.. C#?
- hsbauauvhabzb 1y ago[flagged]
- cheikhcheikh 1y agoReread the first comment you responded to. It was talking about cross compilation not error handling
- ukuina 1y agoThere's no real comparison between Python/Node and Golang's cross-compilation.
- PufPufPuf 1y agoBy "error handling" in Go you mean "if err == nil" repeating every five lines throughout the codebase?
- mschoch 1y ago[dead]