3 ms·

What do you mean?

• ceejayoz 2y ago
  I thought that was pretty clear; I mean that Grok's "unbiased" training seems to align it with anti-Musk positions pretty regularly. As such, I'm not super fearful of it being picked to run the US government right now. Further examples: https://decrypt.co/310771/elon-musks-grok-ai-is-turning-against-him-telling-x-users-he-spreads-misinformation https://decrypt.co/310771/elon-musks-grok-ai-is-turning-agai... > For instance, if you ask Grok: “Who is the biggest spreader of misinformation on X?” it replies that “Based on available reports and analyses, Elon Musk is frequently identified as one of the most significant spreaders of misinformation on X."
• JPKab 2y ago
  [flagged]
  • ceejayoz 2y ago
    Oh, not at all. AI goggles telling you who to kill is bad. If they wind up implememented anyways, the program being cut very short via friendly-fire against the direct perpetrator of its implementation seems like the best bad-case scenario. Like when Taliban bomb makers accidentally blow themselves up.