3 ms·
Kinda answers its doe question though To be fair, dictionary one-liners might be a tiny bit less easy to read: {"key1": "value1" "key2": "value2"} Not just a
by jonplackett 2y ago
Kinda answers its doe question though
To be fair, dictionary one-liners might be a tiny bit less easy to read:
{"key1": "value1" "key2": "value2"}
Not just a bit less easy, a lot less easy
- ghusto 2y agoHe also accounts for that immediately by saying they should therefore be optional.
- t3rra 2y agoa hugely uneasy to read indeed. I feel wasted time to read the article. So horrible.
- yonixw 2y agoThis. The article suggestion will make parsers need lookahead support instead of simple state machine. Is "key1" array of ["value1", "key2"] ? or string "value1"? We can't now until we find ':'.
- frizlab 2y agoHuh? The article does not suggest dropping the [] or did I miss something?