4 ms·
I wonder people who criticize the government for using Signal, you only discuss work using company-approved applications? Also why do they use Signal and not Te
by codedokode 2y ago
I wonder people who criticize the government for using Signal, you only discuss work using company-approved applications? Also why do they use Signal and not Telegram, which probably has more useful features like spoilers, paid messages, animated emojis etc.
- cafard 2y agoNo, when I am discussing military actions, I write postcards instead. But please note that I use Pig Latin for extra security.
- samgranieri 2y agoI use Pony Express
- Scubabear68 2y agoPig Latin with ROT13 encoding, of course!
- sorcerer-mar 2y agoMy work doesn't involve sending American pilots over enemy territory or relaying information from intelligence assets inside terrorist organizations. Is this a serious question?
- watwut 2y agoI actually do. There is literally zero reason to not do so ... even ignoring security.
- crazygringo 2y agoExactly. My work-provided chat app and email automatically contains the whole company's contacts. And the messages show up on people's work devices. If I wanted to use a personal chat or personal email, I'd need to know their personal details, or copy-paste their work info, it would confuse which accounts they reply to... it would make no sense at all. I keep my work convos and personal convos separate not just because it's company policy, but it's 100x easier for me.
- pjc50 2y agoThe entire financial industry got slapped very heavily for organizing things in secret chats after the LIBOR scandal. A lot of people regularly get training of what may and may not discuss under what channels.
- ozozozd 2y agoWell, I don’t always break rules, but when I do, I make sure I am not breaking laws. Government rules are often laws. Company rules are often internal policies. Potato, puh-treason…