3 ms·
> He's considered a moral and good character purely because he was fully willing to sacrifice his child. We're supposed to think that the morally correct thing
by Aeolun 2y ago
> He's considered a moral and good character purely because he was fully willing to sacrifice his child. We're supposed to think that the morally correct thing to do was to listen to God and murder his child.
The whole point of the story is that Abraham is even willing to sacrifice the son he loves because god wills it. It's a story about having faith that there is a good reason for what god requests of you, even if you don't always know what it is. Abraham is virtuous because he doesn't question at all.
I'm not sure anymore if the story skips over the heartache this undoubtedly causes him.
Of course more cynical people immediately ask why god needs Abraham to sacrifice his son to no apparent benefit other than to prove his faith in the first place.
- tombert 2y agoI mentioned on a different sub thread, I think the story would be more powerful if Abraham himself decided not to kill Isaac, like if he had realized that no matter what God is offering, it’s not worth doing something completely evil. Like the Huck Finn “all right then I’ll go to hell”
- Aeolun 2y agoIt would be for atheists, but then it would be left out of the bible ;)