4 ms·
> Look at how many apps require permission to see you contacts. It is so annoying that it’s either "give access to ALL my contacts and ALL their information (y
by hk__2 2y ago
> Look at how many apps require permission to see you contacts.
It is so annoying that it’s either "give access to ALL my contacts and ALL their information (yes, even the notes I took on their favorite things for next Christmas)" or "don’t give access". I wish we could limit the number of contacts and the level of information we give.
- normie3000 2y agoPhoto access has improved a lot in this regard recently.
- subscribed 2y agoCheck if GrapheneOS suits your needs. It has "contact scopes", ie you cna literally allow the app to see single contact only. Same with storage scopes: one directory and that's it.
- CharlesW 2y ago> It is so annoying that it’s either "give access to ALL my contacts and ALL their information… […] I wish we could limit the number of contacts and the level of information we give. iOS added fine-grained (at the contact level) access to contacts data last year. https://lifehacker.com/tech/you-can-control-which-contacts-apps-can-access-in-ios-18 https://lifehacker.com/tech/you-can-control-which-contacts-a...
- MBCook 2y agoThey did the same for photos years ago. Many apps have not updated and perhaps never will.
- CharlesW 2y agoThey don't need to be, since it's enforced at the OS level. Users can limit permissions to individual contacts regardless of whether iOS apps have been updated to explicitly handle that use case.
- MBCook 2y agoI meant updated yo the newer nicer replacement UIs. For example I know Slack still doesn’t use the single picture picker. They still want access to everything. So iOS lets me limit what they can see, but it’s still a pain compared to just letting me pick the one picture I want.
- mercutio2 2y agoiOS hasn’t allowed access to contact notes for several years, and last year added support for providing arbitrary subsets of contacts to all apps.