3 ms·
I'd assume the synchronization primitives in OSes are written with the memory ordering in mind at the least.
by jamessinghal 2y ago
I'd assume the synchronization primitives in OSes are written with the memory ordering in mind at the least.
- IshKebab 2y agoYeah I think this is true - they can be nops on x86. But it's still going to be better to have explicit sync instructions only where needed than implicit sync everywhere.