3 ms·

So, it works perfectly to most sane use cases with git.

• amelius 2y ago
  Git isn't that opinionated.
• diggan 2y ago
  Are you saying storing pointers to large files isn't sane to do in Git? What are your suggested solution for dealing with large assets you want versioned and easily accessible? If you're really dogmatic about it, I guess you would have no dependency lock files either, but commit all that code directly to git instead of having references. Some people do that, so wouldn't be a huge surprise.
  • nine_k 2y ago
    It means that the large majority of projects that don't use git-lfs can improve their security immediately and without any trouble. It also may mean that git-shell could use a few PRs adding whatever is missing for git-lfs to work, given that git-lfs does not do anything extra fancy.
  • asdffdasy 2y ago
    use something that can actually version your large files. git-lfs is silly and trying too hard. it's the literal faster horse of file versioning. it's so wrong by design i don't even know where to start.