4 ms·
That's not really what symbolists actually argue. Read Fodor and Pylylshyn 1988 to better understand how symbolists view the relationship between symbolic repre
by suddenlybananas 2y ago
That's not really what symbolists actually argue. Read Fodor and Pylylshyn 1988 to better understand how symbolists view the relationship between symbolic representation and connectionist models. What you're saying is akin to saying there's no point in doing neuroscience or trying to understand neural-networks as its just particle physics deep down.
- sitkack 2y agoConnectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Connectionism-and-cognitive-architecture%3A-A-Fodor-Pylyshyn/56cbfcbfffd8c54bd8477d10b6e0e17e097b97c7 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Connectionism-and-cogn... Fodor and Pylyshyn's Critique of Connectionism and the Brain as Basis of the Mind https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14736 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.14736