4 ms·
That disingenuous argument is an example, of course. I already put that inside my argument. It's the chosen words that irk me. Apple does things, yes. But it no
by rambambram 2y ago
That disingenuous argument is an example, of course. I already put that inside my argument. It's the chosen words that irk me. Apple does things, yes. But it not only restricts Pebble, as they make it seem, it restricts everybody.
- bitpush 2y agoI dont fault Apple. A company exists to make maximum money. Most monopolistic actions look like normal business decision, dare I say, even obvious. In this case, Apple is 100% exhibiting those tendencies. They are not acting maliciously, but their actions have that effect.