4 ms·
>That, and basically guaranteeing you don't have to deal with the company you just acquired having deployed their accounts with the same 10/16 subnet your own c
by yyyk 2y ago
>That, and basically guaranteeing you don't have to deal with the company you just acquired having deployed their accounts with the same 10/16 subnet your own company uses.
I always found that to be a desperate talking point. 'Prepare your network for the incredibly rare event where you intend to integrate directly' (didn't anyone hear of network segmentation?). It makes a lot more sense to worry about the ISP unilaterally changing your prefix - something that can only happen in IPv6.
- bigstrat2003 2y ago> It makes a lot more sense to worry about the ISP unilaterally changing your prefix - something that can only happen in IPv6. ISPs unilaterally change your DHCP address on IPv4 all the time. And in any situation where you would have a static address for IPv4, your ISP should have no problem giving you a static v6 prefix. This argument makes no sense at all.
- shawabawa3 2y agoYour ISP provided ipv4 has no relation to your internal private network space My understanding is that for some bizarre reason this is not usually the case with IPv6