3 ms·
> It just means, the vehicle is capable of full self driving, which is true for most conditions and something most cars are not capable of. But that’s not true
by akmarinov 2y ago
> It just means, the vehicle is capable of full self driving, which is true for most conditions and something most cars are not capable of.
But that’s not true.
It’s not capable of fully driving itself, hence why the supervised part was added
- razemio 2y agoIt most certainly is. Is it reliable? No, not at all. However there are many YouTube channels showing certain routes, where this car is capable from driving itself from a to b without the need of manual intervention. Including parking.
- cwillu 2y ago“Reliable” is implicit in “fully self-driving”, otherwise I could call my car self-driving when it manages to stay in its lane after I let go of the steering wheel.
- razemio 2y agoAgain. Present a name, which fits and describes the capabilities of FSD. It can under certain circumstances drive a route completely on its own. This is not a lane assist, not (advanced) Cruise Control, not HDA and not Super Cruise.
- cwillu 2y ago* trip control * trip assist * co-pilot * auto steer and throttle * partial self-driving (i.e., what it's actually doing!) * hands-free steering
- akmarinov 2y agoNaming is hard, but FULL self driving definitely ain’t it Otherwise what would you name a L5 system that 100% drives autonomously all the time without any input?
- cwillu 2y agoExactly. They knew exactly what they were doing when they named it.
- SAI_Peregrinus 2y agoPartial Self Driving.
- razemio 2y agoI just checked the current numbers on FSD Tracker. It is at 95% now for the last 30 days. That's a number I would call reliable under supervision. It is way higher than it used to be. It was at 73% when I checked it the last time. https://teslafsdtracker.com/ https://teslafsdtracker.com/