4 ms·
Electricity is a by product of some source of energy, it doesn't just materialise unless your taking about capturing lightening in a bottle.
by Guthur 2y ago
Electricity is a by product of some source of energy, it doesn't just materialise unless your taking about capturing lightening in a bottle.
- Retric 2y agoHydrogen is also a byproduct of some source of energy, it doesn’t just materialize. The difference is batteries are vastly more efficient at storage and doing useful work with that stored energy. There’s use cases where that’s fine like rocketry, but efficiency or energy density is usually a dealbreaker.
- Guthur 2y agoWhat the hell are you talking about, a. batteries weren't mentioned and b. hydrogen is on the periodic table and exists as an element, and can actually be found in its pure form.
- zejn 2y agoWhile hydrogen can be found in its pure form, the reserves are not really developed. Hydrogen is generally considered a storage, not a resource. Same as battery.
- Retric 2y agoPure hydrogen is not found in meaningful quantities on earth. There’s a huge demand for hydrogen in industry and it’s almost exclusively met with steam methane reforming there’s some methane pyrolysis and a little green hydrogen but not much. If people could just drill for it, they would happier do so as being so light it’s easy to separate out from other gasses.
- pfdietz 2y ago> Pure hydrogen is not found in meaningful quantities on earth. This is not necessarily true. A recent discovery in France could contain as much as 250 million metric tons of hydrogen (but that's a generous upper bound).
- Retric 2y agoSure there’s useful amounts of grey hydrogen but not enough for any kind of energy transition. We’re talking about the useful energy from ~1 number power plant over its lifespan. So find ~1,000 such locations and that would be a big deal.
- pfdietz 2y agoThis is white hydrogen, not grey hydrogen. It's not clear what would be available globally if it were looked for as it was in France.
- Retric 2y agoAhh ops flipped though there’s a really long list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_production https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydrogen_production
- Dylan16807 2y ago> a. batteries weren't mentioned What do you think people mean when they say "electric" in this context? It's batteries.
- jimnotgym 2y agoVastly more efficient at storing electricity. Vastly more expensive to construct, using rare materials. Have a Vastly shorter lifespan than a hydrogen tank and much lower energy density. Everything is a compromise
- Retric 2y agoMany batteries actually last significantly longer than common hydrogen storage tanks, hydrogen embrittlement is a major issue. Type III and IV tanks have a life cycle of 10 years. https://www.awoe.net/Hydrogen-Storage-LCA.html https://www.awoe.net/Hydrogen-Storage-LCA.html Hydrogen has also terrible volumetric energy density. It’s also really heavy until you scale to huge tanks.
- rocqua 2y agoHow expensive, big, and heavy would a hydrogen tank (farm) be if it had to supply a whole winter for, say, 1million people. I ask because one of the bigger transition issues I see in Europe is load shifting from summer surplus to winter deficits, specifically for heating.
- _ph_ 2y agoWhy would you want to store enough energy to supply for a whole winter? Wind energy delivers most power during the winter and even solar contributes a bit. The actual amounts to store would be a fraction of that. Of course, that might be the one single good use of hydrogen as a means of storage, but way less storage is needed than most would think.
- pfdietz 2y agoOn such a scale hydrogen would be store underground in solution-mined salt caverns, not above ground in tanks. Europe has enough salt formations to potentially store millions of GWh of hydrogen, far more than would be needed.
- Heston 2y agoHydrogen's volumetric energy density is about as good as lithium-ion. The cost of replacing a hydrogen tank vs a lithium battery is absolutely massive. You also aren't considering the energy density lost in cold weather for batteries.