I understand your point and if that were the case I'd accept it as valid but I'm not the only one in my interpretation, judging by other comments affirming the

I understand your point and if that were the case I'd accept it as valid but I'm not the only one in my interpretation, judging by other comments affirming the points of things that "should happen". >I also disagree with you that widespread agreement on norms is some problematic slippery slope. Failure to distinguish between norms and objectivity as you are doing is what leads to widespread norms being enforced absurdly by a tyranny of the majority. Objectivity huh? Tyranny of the majority huh? Why do I have the feeling you're generalizing some specific partisan/personal problem and you'd rather not discuss the specific because it's then less defensible? I'll call and raise a self-centered tyranny of the anglosphere.