4 ms·
The odd thing is, if true, the damage has been done. Few people will believe otherwise. I know little about bluetooth and I kind of believe what this article
by jmclnx 2y ago
The odd thing is, if true, the damage has been done. Few people will believe otherwise.
I know little about bluetooth and I kind of believe what this article says, the original did not seem "right" to me.
But, in reality, bluetooth security has no real meaning to me since I do all I can to avoid bluetooth :)
- drweevil 2y agoLikewise, to me the characterization of this as a "backdoor", coupled with "China", is a 'smell', not only in this case but in many articles I've seen in the recent past. I don't think it's hard to get this right. Media outlets can and should do better.
- seba_dos1 2y ago> if true There's no doubt it's true. There's no mention of any "backdoor" in the original presentation slides, it all came from twisted reporting which falls apart as soon as you actually look at the supposed "backdoor". No extensive Bluetooth knowledge required, just some basic computer literacy. If there's a backdoor there, it hasn't been found yet ;)