5 ms·
We can only hope it's the start of a trend. I can't think of a single car feature I would want on a touchscreen instead of a physical control, except I guess s
by BrenBarn 2y ago
We can only hope it's the start of a trend. I can't think of a single car feature I would want on a touchscreen instead of a physical control, except I guess something like GPS (which I don't really consider a car feature, but maybe that's just because I'm getting old and curmudgeonly).
- precommunicator 2y agoAny feature that you have to fully stop to activate and is not often used IMO would be fine on a touchscreen, e.g disabling ESP.
- amelius 2y agoThe upside of a touchscreen is that you can make the buttons disappear if they go out of context.
- nottorp 2y agoWho decides the context?
- phatfish 2y agoRandom know-it-alls on the internet obviously.
- bipson 2y agoThe point is that those "essential functions" never go out of context.
- amelius 2y agoIt's easy to end up with something like this though: https://phonewire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ne210_kx_nt680b_f.png https://phonewire.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ne210_kx_nt...
- CamperBob2 2y agoWhat's wrong with that? The optimal UI for anything remotely complex arguably includes both physical and touchscreen controls.