4 ms·
Private employers added just 77,000 jobs in February, far below expectations
- impish9208 2y agoNote: ADP numbers, not official data. Edit: Not sure what’s up with the downvotes. ADP is a private payroll management and hiring company. So they do have a good view into that sector of the labor market. But not all employers use them, and they don’t include government and other types of employment. The Non-Farm Payrolls number due on Friday from the BLS is what actually matters. ADP is intentionally fronting the BLS to position themselves as some sort of reliable data source.
- A4ET8a8uTh0_v2 2y agoFWIW, ADP numbers are based on actual payrolls, while official data is a survey..
- Someone1234 2y agoADP is only private jobs, whereas BLS is also government, which has had job losses. If anything this MAY paint a misleadingly positive overall picture. I guess we'll know here soon.
- angry_moose 2y agoMost of the federal losses likely won't show up in the report this week as they were after the reporting window (Feb 15th or something like that?). The April one is likely where it's really going to show up.
- avidphantasm 2y agoAssuming we have anything close to reliable data coming out of BLS going forward.
- readthenotes1 2y agoThat's a hilarious comment given the complaints about the BLS reports the last 4 years. look up BLS versus household survey and maybe you can see some of the hand wringing...
- kasey_junk 2y agoWhen I was trading both numbers were important indicators. And ADP is definitely a reliable source. For the foreseeable future ADP will be very important because it isolates on private jobs which will help to compare to the federal government firings and the fallout from that.
- oinkbutton 2y ago[dead]
- alistairSH 2y agoI don't believe he was implying anything about either set of data, only pointing out that this is the ADP data and the BLS data should be released shortly. But, I'm with you, there is little reason to trust any official government numbers right now. I don't know how much DOGE has infiltrated BLS, but I'm not giving them the benefit of the doubt given what's happened across other agencies.
- financetechbro 2y agoADP has been a data source relied on by the street for years
- nikhizzle 2y agoThis is super interesting. I run a remote job board as a hobby (see below). My best estimate of jobs my crawler found as well as ones it did not is about 12,000 - 15,000 remote jobs added in February. This is a much higher proportion than I would have guessed otherwise. (Edit: I am wrong, I am comparing US jobs to global remote jobs, still interesting, just bad proportions) https://tangerinefeed.net/ https://tangerinefeed.net/
- jszymborski 2y agoIf Donald keeps at it with World Economic War I, this is only going to get worse.
- e40 2y agoStagflation, here we come. (Inflation and high unemployment.). Not seen since the late 70s, IIRC.
- duxup 2y agoIt would be wild to go all the way from the housing crisis where in response the government spending was going to supposedly create tons of inflation and now and still not running into massive inflation, or even seeing expected economic downturn cycles. And then running headlong into something as insidious as stagflation.
- readthenotes1 2y agoThe government spending in 2009+ did cause tons of inflation - - but it was in the financial and collectible market, not in bread.
- tim333 2y agoI think this would be World Economic War II really with the Tariff Act of 1930 kicking off America's previous Great thing.
- darkwizard42 2y agoThis will likely drive unemployment up. The retraction of capital from labor spending doesn't seem like a great thing overall, but I wonder where the money will go (does it go instead to scalable improvements like infrastructure/cloud spend?)
- cloverich 2y agoI expect some of it is going simply to savings, or advanced allocation of materials ahead of tariffs. Some companies may simply opt to reduce spend ahead of perceived economic downturn e.g. to maintain reserves in anticipation of reduced income. But I imagine this is measurable and would be curious the extent to which this impacts the overall trends.
- bb88 2y agoSavings to Treasury Bills/Bonds, would be the mostly likely outcome. If the market is expected to do -2.5% this year (e.g. who knows really), not doing anything with your money and letting the government pay interest is often the best option. You're not expanding, sure. But you can take solace that 2% YoY is better than -10%.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- quelup 2y agoTop comment is a one sided political one...what happened to HN? :( Maybe it's always been this politically one sided and I just hadn't noticed until now, I just always saw it as a place for cool tech and real discussions. But now I'm noticing liberal comments are incentivized and anything remotely non liberal (like this one) are flagged into oblivion. I guess this means I should probably spend less time in comment sections, content just seems skewed now.
- alistairSH 2y agoThat's funny because not that long ago, HN had a pretty noticeable conservative+libertarian slant. I think what you're seeing as liberal comments are really a testament to just how batshit crazy the current administration is behaving. Regardless of your political alignment, this amount of chaos an uncertainty is generally disfavored by the markets, the economy, etc. Edit - lol, and now I have the downvotes that prove HN isn't suddenly gone liberal - there's a big chunk of regulars who are FAR from liberal.
- jszymborski 2y agoWhat am I supposed to say? "Launching an Economic World War on the basis of an unfounded national crisis with age old allies and sinking the US economy along with them is an interesting political decision for President Trump with uncertain outcomes and motivations"?
- Ancalagon 2y agoSeriously. "American economy actively being dismantled. Voters shocked that leopard ate THEIR faces."
- krapp 2y agoDon't you understand that holding any particular opinion on any non-technical matter is partisanship, and that partisan politics is intellectually bankrupt? We aspire to a higher standard here.
- 7e 2y ago
- duxup 2y agoJust perusing resumes recently and we got a ton of resumes from banking / insurance. Not at all sure why, could be coincidence but that's how it shook out for us recently.
- ffjffsfr 2y agoTrade, education, health services and IT saw jobs losses. More jobs in leisure and hospitality. Impact of tariffs is still not clear, also not clear how the tariffs will look like. I suspect uncertainty plays a role. Employers reluctant to hire if they are uncertain about future. Good thing it may justify lowering interest rates