3 ms·
OP point is that the second dev isn’t being billed as junior though and is in fact being billed as a senior, despite obviously not being one. It’s Accenture tha
by vin047 2y ago
OP point is that the second dev isn’t being billed as junior though and is in fact being billed as a senior, despite obviously not being one. It’s Accenture that’s making the profit here, by billing for 2 seniors but only supplying 1 (actually probably 0 as I bet the “good” dev isn’t a senior either and is closer to mid-level)
- Daktar 2y agoI will just like to add I never said they're senior nor do I know their billing rate. They were just given to us as 'experienced hires' (no senior or junior in the job title). As a mid-level peon in the company myself I'm not really privvy to much more information than that.
- vin047 2y agoWhat is the expected skill level of an “experienced hire” if not mid-senior? Especially from a consulting/contracting company.
- uberman 2y agoGood point. I guess I assumed that there was a different description/billing rate based on their observed skill levels.