2 ms·

I don’t think there’s anyone in the Elixir community who wouldn’t love it if companies would figure out that everyone is writing software that contains an ad ho

I don’t think there’s anyone in the Elixir community who wouldn’t love it if companies would figure out that everyone is writing software that contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang, and start hiring Elixir or Gleam devs. The future is here, but it is not evenly distributed.

deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
ikety 2y ago
It's so odd seeing people dissuade others for implementing "niche" languages like Elixir or Gleam. If you post a job opportunity with these languages, I guarantee you will be swamped with qualified candidates that are very passionate and excited to work with these languages full time.
- hinkley 2y ago
  At this point I’m worried that because elixir is over 10 years old that it’ll never arrive. But then Python is older than Java and here we are.
ignoramous 2y ago
> writing software that contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang Since you were at AWS (?), you'd know that Erlang did get its shot at distributed systems there. I'm unsure what went wrong, but if not c/c++, it was all JVM based languages soon after that.
- hinkley 2y ago
  No I worked a contract in the retail side and would not wish that job on anyone. My most recent favorite boss works there now and I haven’t even said hi because I’m afraid he’ll offer me a job.
- worthless-trash 2y ago
  I have noticed that in corporate, langauges dont fail on technical merit, but its fashion merits.
jimbokun 2y ago
Yes, my sense reading the article was the user is reinventing Erlang.
seivan 2y ago
[dead]
rramadass 2y ago
I decided long ago (after having implemented various protocols and shared-memory multi-threaded code) that what i like best is to use Erlang as "the fabric" for the graph of distributed computing and C/C++ for heavy lifting at any node.
- hinkley 2y ago
  I’m hoping the JIT will finally start to change that.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

ikety 2y ago

It's so odd seeing people dissuade others for implementing "niche" languages like Elixir or Gleam. If you post a job opportunity with these languages, I guarantee you will be swamped with qualified candidates that are very passionate and excited to work with these languages full time.

hinkley 2y ago
At this point I’m worried that because elixir is over 10 years old that it’ll never arrive. But then Python is older than Java and here we are.

ignoramous 2y ago

> writing software that contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang Since you were at AWS (?), you'd know that Erlang did get its shot at distributed systems there. I'm unsure what went wrong, but if not c/c++, it was all JVM based languages soon after that.

hinkley 2y ago
No I worked a contract in the retail side and would not wish that job on anyone. My most recent favorite boss works there now and I haven’t even said hi because I’m afraid he’ll offer me a job.
worthless-trash 2y ago
I have noticed that in corporate, langauges dont fail on technical merit, but its fashion merits.

jimbokun 2y ago

Yes, my sense reading the article was the user is reinventing Erlang.

seivan 2y ago

[dead]

rramadass 2y ago

I decided long ago (after having implemented various protocols and shared-memory multi-threaded code) that what i like best is to use Erlang as "the fabric" for the graph of distributed computing and C/C++ for heavy lifting at any node.

hinkley 2y ago
I’m hoping the JIT will finally start to change that.