4 ms·
Facebook is Dying
- quattrofan 14y agoI couldn't finish reading that, it was so badly written.
- realize 14y agoYes, I gave up at "dichotomously opposed".
- markyc 14y agolinkbait isn't what it used to be
- ummjackson 14y agoI couldn't either. Read as if it was written in another language, translated to English and then someone went to town on a thesaurus with it.
- pferde 14y agoI finished reading it, in the same way one finishes watching a hilariously bad movie. :) It was all just grand rhetorics and little substance, to the very end.
- lwm 14y agoWhy has this been voted up?
- spaghetti 14y agoWonder if the article was auto-generated? "turnover and profits are down..." so at least turnover is down which sounds like it's actually good for the "once gargantuan beast".
- r00fus 14y agoTurnover is a trading term: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/turnover.asp http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/turnover.asp
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- the_gipsy 14y agoHeadline should have been "Is facebook dying?"
- klez 14y agoSo the answer would have been 'no'?
- tsahyt 14y agoIn the long run the answer will be yes.
- grailholder 14y agoThat's obviously true, I think the question at hand is about how much longer its run will last.
- tsahyt 14y agoYes I agree, I was really stating the obvious here. It depends on what you define as the "death" of Facebook. When it is no longer a profitable business whatsoever, or when they've lost the majority of their users.
- the_gipsy 14y agoSorry, I was referencing Betteridge's Law of Headlines which states that "Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word 'no'". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridges_Law_of_Headlines
- klez 14y agoActually I was referencing that too.