3 ms·
Brazil was playing both sides, much like Sweden. Profiting from the war while staying out of it. Brazil only joined the war because the US gave big loans to Bra
by DanielHB 2y ago
Brazil was playing both sides, much like Sweden. Profiting from the war while staying out of it. Brazil only joined the war because the US gave big loans to Brazil to fund the creation of steelworks factories to kickstart the steel production in the country. The sinking of the ships was just the official excuse to declare war, but Brazil was aligned with the US a few years before that.
From:
https://guides.loc.gov/brazil-us-relations/brazil-world-war-ii https://guides.loc.gov/brazil-us-relations/brazil-world-war-...
> Foreign Minister Oswaldo Aranha's five-week visit to the United States earlier in the year secured Brazil substantial lines of credit, loans, and technical assistance for the development of Brazilian rubber and mining industries. On September 26, 1940 the United States and Brazil signed agreement for the financing and construction of the Volta Redonda steel mill. By the end of 1940, Brazil had privately resolved to throw its lot in with the Allies.
I recommend reading the whole article, very interesting. I remember my history teacher in high school actually teaching this (he mentioned only steel, not rubber), I am very surprised this fact is downplayed and a lot of Brazilians don't know about it. I remember my teacher also mentioning that Brazil tried to secure similar deals with Germany but with no luck, but I can't find any sources for that.
- marcosdumay 2y agoBrazil wasn't profiting from the war. Unless you count selling food and raw material as war profiteering. It did require a largish monetary loan as condition of entering the war. And yes, it did invest the loan on a some industries. Also, all of this is extensively covered by Brazilian schools. I have no idea what accusation you have of downplaying stuff.
- DanielHB 2y ago> Brazil wasn't profiting from the war. Unless you count selling food and raw material as war profiteering. Yes I do, Brazil was selling food and raw materials to both sides while staying out of the war just like Sweden. The main difference is that Brazil moved out of its neutral position several years before the end of the war, but that only happened because of US direct support. Sweden probably got similar deals from the US but didn't want to risk getting invaded like Norway was. > Also, all of this is extensively covered by Brazilian schools. I have no idea what accusation you have of downplaying stuff. Like I mentioned, I was taught this in high school, but a lot of Brazilian people I mention this fact to doesn't seem to know about it. This is anecdotal though.